论星辰无关格局
子平真诠 · section 17 · 沈孝瞻 · 474 characters
Original text
八字格局,专以月令配四柱,至于星辰好歹,既不能为生克之用,又何以操成败之权?况于局有碍,即财官美物,尚不能济,何论吉星?于局有用,即七煞伤官,何谓凶神乎?是以格局既成,即使满盘孤辰入煞,何损其贵?格局既破,即使満盘天德贵人,何以为功?今人不知轻重,⻅是吉星,遂致拋却用神,不管四柱,妄论贵贱,谬谈祸福,甚可笑也。
况书中所云禄贵,往往指正官而言,不是禄堂人贵人。如正财得伤贵为奇,伤贵也,伤官乃生财之具,正财得之,所以为奇,若指贵人,则伤贵为何物乎?又若因得禄而避位,得禄者,得官也,运得官乡,宜乎进爵,然如财用伤官食神,运透官则格条,正官运又遇官则重,凡此之类,只可避位也。若作禄堂,不独无是理,抑且得禄避位,文法上下相顾。古人作书,何至不通若是!
又若女命,有云“贵众则舞裙歌扇”。贵众者,官众也,女以官为夫,正夫岂可叠出乎?一女众夫,舞裙歌扇,理固然也。若作贵人,乃是天星,并非夫主,何碍于众,而必为娼妓乎?
然星辰命书,亦有谈及,不善看书者执之也。如“贵人头上带财官,门充驰⻢”,盖财官如人美貌,贵人如人衣服,貌之美者,衣服美则现。其实财官成格,即非贵人头上,怕不门充驰⻢!又局清贵,又带二德,必受荣封。若专主二德,则何不竟云带二德受两国之封,而秘先曰无煞乎?若云命逢险格,柱有二德,逢凶有救,右免于危,则亦有之,然终无关于格局之贵贱也。
This site's reading
本节针对当时流行以神煞、星辰论命的现象进行辨析。原文指出,八字格局的核心在于月令配合四柱形成的用神,星辰既不能参与五行生克,也不能掌握成败之权。文中举例:格局已成,即便命中带孤辰等凶星,也无损其贵;格局已破,即使天德贵人满盘,也难以发挥作用。作者特别纠正“禄贵”“贵众”等说法,认为“禄贵”通常指正官,不是禄堂或神煞贵人;女命“贵众”的“贵”是官星,因女命以官为夫,官多则夫星不专,并非天乙贵人众多之意。后半部分引用“贵人头上带财官”等旧句,说明神煞只如衣饰,真正起决定作用的仍是财官与格局。本节与全书月令用神论一致,提醒读者研习时不可因吉星而忽视用神,神煞不能替代格局判断。
The text is reproduced from the named edition without alteration. The reading is this site's own; commentators differ. Where the book judges 格局 or 用神 it is stating doctrine, not a conclusion about the reader's own chart.
Terms in this passage
These terms occur in the passage above. The links go to this site's explanations; the text does not necessarily use them the way they are used today.
Witness: deeporacle-lab: engines/third-party/china-testing-bazi/books/zipingzhenquan.md · zipingzhenquan.md (lab) · sha a0b1954eceb356f6
Read this against your own chart
Cast your own four pillars first, then come back to the text.