子产坏晋馆垣

古文观止 · section 21 · 吳楚材 · 吳調侯 編 · 669 characters

Original text

子产相郑伯以如晋。晋侯以我丧故,未之见也。子产使尽坏其馆之垣,而纳车马焉。士文伯让之曰:「敝邑以政刑之不修,寇盗充斥,无若诸侯之属,辱在寡君者何。是以令吏人完客所馆,高其闬闳,厚其墙垣,以无忧客使。今吾子坏之,虽从者能戒,其若异客何。以敝邑之为盟主,缮完葺墙,以待宾客。若皆毁之,其何以共命。{{*|晋为诸侯盟主,而缮治完固,以覆盖墙垣,所以待诸侯之宾客。若来者皆毁之,将何以供给宾客之命乎?}}寡君使匄请命。对曰:「以敝邑褊小,介于大国,诛求无时,是以不敢宁居,悉索敝赋,以来会时事。逢执事之不闲,而未得见。又不获闻命,未知见时。不敢输币,亦不敢暴露。其输之,则君之府实也,非荐陈之,不敢输也。其暴露之,则恐燥湿之不时,而朽蠹,以重敝邑之罪。{{*|}}侨闻文公之为盟主也,宫室卑庳,无观台榭,{{*|谢,}}以崇大诸侯之馆。馆如公寝,库厩缮修,司空以时平易道路,圬人以时塓馆宫室。诸侯宾至,甸设庭燎,仆人巡宫,车马有所,宾从有代,巾车脂辖,隶人牧圉,各瞻其事,百官之属,各展其物。公不留宾,而亦无废事,忧乐同之,事则巡之,教其不知,而恤其不足。宾至如归,无宁菑患,不畏寇盗,而亦不患燥湿。今铜鞮之宫数里,而诸侯舍于隶人,门不容车,而不可逾越。盗贼公行,而夭厉不戒。宾见无时,命不可知。若又勿坏,是无所藏币,以重罪也。敢请执事,将何所命之。虽君之有鲁丧,亦敝邑之忧也。若获荐币,修垣而行,君之惠也。敢惮勤劳。文伯复命。赵文子曰:「信。我实不德,而以隶人之垣,以赢诸侯,是吾罪也。使士文伯谢不敏焉。

晋侯见郑伯有加礼,厚其宴好而归之。乃筑诸侯之馆。

叔向曰:「辞之不可以已也如是夫!子产有辞,诸侯赖之。若之何其释辞也?《诗》曰:『辞之辑矣,民之协矣,辞之怿矣,民之莫矣。』其知之矣。」

晋为盟主,而子产以蕞尔郑朝晋,尽坏馆垣,大是奇事。只是胸中早有成算,故说来句句针锋相对,义正而不阿,词强而不激。文伯不措一语,文子输心帖服,叔向叹息不已,子产之有辞,洵非小补也。

This site's reading

The reading for this section has not been written yet; the original text above is complete.

The text is reproduced from the named edition without alteration. The reading is this site's own; commentators differ. Where the book judges 格局 or 用神 it is stating doctrine, not a conclusion about the reader's own chart.

Terms in this passage

These terms occur in the passage above. The links go to this site's explanations; the text does not necessarily use them the way they are used today.

Witness: https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E5%8F%A4%E6%96%87%E8%A7%80%E6%AD%A2 · wikisource/古文觀止_卷2.txt · sha cf3b3496c630e34e

Read this against your own chart

Cast your own four pillars first, then come back to the text.

子產壞晉館垣 — 古文觀止