象祠记
古文观止 · section 182 · 吳楚材 · 吳調侯 編 · 566 characters
Original text
灵博之山,有象祠焉。其下诸苗夷之居者,咸神而祠之。宣尉安君,因诸苗夷之请,新其祠屋,而请记于予。予曰:「毁之乎,其新之也?」曰:「新之。」「新之也何居乎?」曰:「斯祠之肇也,盖莫知其原,然吾诸蛮夷之居是者,自吾父、吾祖溯曾、高而上,皆尊奉而禋祀焉,举而不敢废也。」予曰:「胡然乎?有鼻之祀,唐之人盖尝毁之。象之道,以为子则不孝,以为弟则傲。斥于唐,而犹存于今;坏于有鼻,而犹盛于兹土也,胡然乎?」
我知之矣:君子之爱若人也,推及于其屋之乌,而况于圣人之弟乎哉?然而祠者为舜,非为象也。意象之死,其在干羽既格之后乎?不然,古之骜桀者岂少哉?而象之祠独延于世。吾于是盖有以见舜德之至,入人之深,而流泽之远且久也。
象之不仁,盖其始焉耳,又乌知其终之不见化于舜也?《书》不云乎:「克谐以孝,烝烝乂,不格奸」,「瞽瞍亦允若」。则已化而为慈父。象犹不弟,不可以为谐。进治于善,则不至于恶。不底于奸,则必入于善。信乎象盖已化于舜矣。《孟子》曰:「天子使吏治其国。」象不得以有为也。斯盖舜爱象之深而虑之详,所以扶持辅导之者之周也。不然,周公之圣,而管、蔡不免焉。斯可以见象之见化于舜,故能任贤使能,而安于其位,泽加于其民,既死而人怀之也。诸侯之卿,命于天子,盖《周官》之制,其殆仿于舜之封象欤?
吾于是盖有以信人性之善,天下无不可化之人也。然则唐人之毁之也,据象之始也;今之诸苗之奉之也,承象之终也。斯义也,吾将以表于世。使知人之不善虽若象焉,犹可以改;而君子之修德,及其至也,虽若象之不仁,而犹可以化之也。
傲弟见化于舜,从象祠想出,从来未经人道破。当与柳子厚《毁鼻亭神记》参看,各辟一解,俱有关名教之文。
This site's reading
The reading for this section has not been written yet; the original text above is complete.
The text is reproduced from the named edition without alteration. The reading is this site's own; commentators differ. Where the book judges 格局 or 用神 it is stating doctrine, not a conclusion about the reader's own chart.
Witness: https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E5%8F%A4%E6%96%87%E8%A7%80%E6%AD%A2 · wikisource/古文觀止_卷12.txt · sha f5ec2db4c03a94a9
Read this against your own chart
Cast your own four pillars first, then come back to the text.