范增论
古文观止 · section 150 · 吳楚材 · 吳調侯 編 · 575 characters
Original text
汉用陈平计,间疏楚君臣。项羽疑范增与汉有私,稍夺其权。增大怒曰:“天下事大定矣,君王自为之,愿赐骸骨归卒伍。”归未至彭城,疽发背死。苏子曰:增之去善矣。不去,羽必杀增。独恨其不早耳。
然则当以何事去?增劝羽杀沛公,羽不听,终以此失天下,当于是去耶?曰:否。增之欲杀沛公,人臣之分也。羽之不杀,犹有君人之度也。增曷为以此去哉?《易》曰:“知几其神乎!”《诗》曰:“相彼雨雪,先集维霰。”增之去,当于羽杀卿子冠军时也。陈涉之得民也,以项燕、扶苏。项氏之兴也,以立楚怀王孙心。而诸侯叛之也,以弑义帝。且义帝之立,增为谋主矣。义帝之存亡,岂独为楚之盛衰,亦增之所与同祸福也。未有义帝亡而增独能久存者也。羽之杀卿子冠军也,是弑义帝之兆也。其弑义帝,则疑增之本也,岂必待陈平哉?物必先腐也,而后虫生之;人必先疑也,而后谗入之。陈平虽智,安能间无疑之主哉?
吾尝论义帝天下之贤主也。独遣沛公入关,不遣项羽;识卿子冠军于稠人之中,而擢以为上将。不贤而能如是乎?羽既矫杀卿子冠军,义帝必不能堪。非羽弑帝,则帝杀羽。不待智者而后知也。增始劝项梁立义帝,诸侯以此服从;中道而弑之,非增之意也。夫岂独非其意,将必力争而不听也。不用其言而杀其所立,羽之疑增,必自是始矣。
方羽杀卿子冠军,增与羽比肩而事义帝,君臣之分未定也。为增计者,力能诛羽则诛之,不能则去之,岂不毅然大丈夫也哉?增年已七十,合则畱,不合则去。不以此时明去就之分,而欲依羽以成功名,陋矣!虽然,增,高帝之所畏也。增不去,项羽不亡。呜呼!增亦人杰也哉!
前半多从实处发议,后半多从虚处设想。只就增去不能早处,层层驳入,段段回环,变幻无端,不可测识。
This site's reading
The reading for this section has not been written yet; the original text above is complete.
The text is reproduced from the named edition without alteration. The reading is this site's own; commentators differ. Where the book judges 格局 or 用神 it is stating doctrine, not a conclusion about the reader's own chart.
Terms in this passage
These terms occur in the passage above. The links go to this site's explanations; the text does not necessarily use them the way they are used today.
Witness: https://zh.wikisource.org/wiki/%E5%8F%A4%E6%96%87%E8%A7%80%E6%AD%A2 · wikisource/古文觀止_卷10.txt · sha 5e9788534951a719
Read this against your own chart
Cast your own four pillars first, then come back to the text.